The Organizational Guide to Effective Business Communication
Issue #17 🧩 How NASA lost a spacecraft due to mismatched units 🧩 Causes of miscommunication 🧩 Benefits of effective communication 🧩 How to improve business communication in organizations
Welcome to this 💎 premium edition 💎 of BPMexplained🧩, the newsletter that helps us work better. For more information, check out the About section.
📑 NOTE: Treat my posts like mini-guides: choose what’s relevant or interesting.
Miscommunication can lead to serious issues.
Imagine delivering a product that’s completely useless because you misunderstood the customers’ requirements. Such errors can turn otherwise successful projects into costly mistakes. Communication breakdowns can disrupt even the best of plans.
So, how can you ensure your communication stays clear and effective?
Keep reading 👇
🛸 NASA Losing a Spacecraft Due to Mismatched Units
In September 1999, NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter was destroyed after nearly ten months of travel, all because of a simple yet devastating mistake in unit conversion. The $125-million spacecraft, designed to study Mars' climate and act as a communications relay for the Mars Polar Lander, was built by Lockheed Martin using English units (inches, feet, and pounds). Meanwhile, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), responsible for navigation, worked in metric units (millimeters, meters, and newtons). When the measurements weren’t converted correctly, the orbiter ended up flying too low into Mars’ atmosphere, where it burned up.
This mistake showed just how risky miscommunication can be, especially in big space missions. Nobody caught the error during the orbiter’s long 461-million-mile journey to Mars, even though NASA’s rigorous quality control procedures were in place. As a result, the spacecraft entered the Martian atmosphere at a dangerously low altitude, leading to its destruction. This event, which should have been a moment of triumph for NASA, turned into a sobering lesson about the importance of precision and oversight in space exploration.
The Mars Climate Orbiter failure was part of a larger pattern of spaceflight mishaps during the late 1990s, often linked to cost-cutting, mismanagement, and insufficient quality control. While some pointed fingers at Lockheed Martin for providing data in English units, NASA officials acknowledged that the error was systemic and reflected broader issues within the space agency's operations. Investigations into the incident revealed gaps in coordination and communication that allowed such a basic discrepancy to go unnoticed, highlighting the need for better safeguards against human error.
This failure also raised concerns about future missions, like the Mars Polar Lander, which had planned to use the orbiter for communication. Analysts warned that the incident could diminish public confidence in NASA's capabilities, despite the agency's historical successes in navigating complex space missions like the Cassini probe. Ironically, while NASA has demonstrated the ability to collaborate effectively with international partners in space, this incident exposed significant challenges with communication and coordination within its own teams in the U.S. - underscoring the importance of consistency and attention to detail in even the most advanced space programs.
🚧 Barriers to Effective Business Communication
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to BPMexplained🧩 to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.